“Channels with more subs per view have more engaged audiences.”
inconclusive
the sample is too thin to read
Held 42 days · Never changed on recordinconclusive on 4 of 5 pooled public channels
What the check does
Across the shared pool. Subscribers per view (lifetime subscribers over lifetime views) against how far into a video the audience typically watches — the median halfway-mark watch ratio across that channel's videos. Pearson correlation across channels; agrees at r >= 0.3, disagrees at r <= -0.3. The belief names three engagement reads; the shared data carries retention only, and the evidence records comment rate and average view duration as absent rather than substituting something else for them.
The reading
Checked on 8 channels ·
How the verdict has moved
- Sep 13, 2026 – Oct 22, 2026inconclusive
- Sep 11, 2026 – Sep 12, 2026inconclusive
Where the belief comes from
Engagement-quality folklore.
Checked against
Keep reading
The rest of the record
This belief sits in a ledger of fifty, each one re-checked every day. These surfaces carry the rest of it.