“Browse pickups are more durable than Suggested-driven impressions.”
inconclusive
the sample is too thin to read
Held 42 days · Never changed on recordinconclusive on 4 of 5 pooled public channels
What the check does
Across the shared pool, durability read as a half-life. Per channel and per source: take the day that source delivered the most views, fit a line through the log of the next 14 days, and read off how long a halving takes. A source that is not fading over that stretch has no half-life and sits out — reporting a cut-off window as a long half-life would flatter whichever source happened to be climbing. The reading is the pool's median of (Browse half-life over Suggested half-life); agrees at >= 1.5, disagrees at <= 1/1.5. The shared data carries source views per day at the channel level, so this is a channel-level durability read rather than the per-video one the belief describes.
The reading
Checked on 9 channels ·
How the verdict has moved
- Sep 13, 2026 – Oct 22, 2026inconclusive
- Sep 11, 2026 – Sep 12, 2026inconclusive
Where the belief comes from
Pickup-pattern folklore.
Checked against
Keep reading
The rest of the record
This belief sits in a ledger of fifty, each one re-checked every day. These surfaces carry the rest of it.